Quarter-end stock, not throughput
Supported asylum counts show how many people were receiving support at the end of the period. They are not new claims, arrivals, or the number of distinct people seen across the period.
Official local-authority snapshot as at 2025-12-31. This page keeps live route data and local hotel evidence on one place-level surface so pressure can be read in context. Supported asylum here means people on support at that quarter end, not the number of different people whose claims were processed locally, and not a one-word substitute for the backlog.
A flat or slowly moving local line does not prove the same people stayed on support, and it does not prove claims were not being processed. It only shows the quarter-end stock that remained on support, which overlaps with but is not identical to the awaiting-decision backlog.
Supported asylum counts show how many people were receiving support at the end of the period. They are not new claims, arrivals, or the number of distinct people seen across the period.
People awaiting an initial decision and people on asylum support overlap, but they are not identical groups. Some supported people are further into appeals or on other support routes, while some people awaiting an initial decision are not in the published support count.
The stock changes when people enter support and when they leave it through case progression, including grants, refusals, withdrawals, departures, or moves out of the published support categories.
A place hovering around the same level can mean low movement, or heavy turnover with inflows offset by exits. The published local tables do not show how many different people passed through support in that area.
Quarter-end stock series to Dec 2025. A rise or fall is a net change in the number of people on support at period end, not the number of new claims or distinct people moving through the caseload. Support stock also overlaps with, but is not identical to, the awaiting-decision backlog.
-4.2% net change in quarter-end stock by the latest step.
+130.1% change in quarter-end stock from the first visible point to Dec 2025.
The visible trend line is built entirely from official quarter-end supported asylum values in the local area series.
Switch metric and comparison frame to read Leicester as a pressure leader, rate outlier, contingency site, or three-pathway case without leaving the page.
Leicester ranks 2 of 35 in East Midlands; Nottingham currently leads this regional measure.
Leicester ranks 12 of 361 nationally on supported asylum.
Leicester ranks 3 of 35 in East Midlands; Nottingham currently leads this regional measure.
Leicester ranks 25 of 361 nationally on supported asylum rate.
Leicester ranks 2 of 35 in East Midlands; West Northamptonshire currently leads this regional measure.
Leicester ranks 30 of 361 nationally on contingency accommodation.
Leicester ranks 2 of 35 in East Midlands; Nottingham currently leads this regional measure.
Leicester ranks 25 of 361 nationally on three-pathway total.
The local picture only becomes legible when supported asylum, contingency use, Ukraine arrivals, and Afghan programme population are kept distinct.
1,512 people are on asylum support here at quarter end, with a rate of 38.93 per 10,000 residents. 328 are in contingency accommodation.
This combines supported asylum, Homes for Ukraine arrivals, and Afghan programme population, representing 0.48% of the local population.
No named current hotel site is attached to this area in the starter ledger yet.
These strips show where Leicester sits in the national distribution for the most important place-level pressure measures.
National distribution across all local-authority rows.
Rate per 10,000 residents.
Hotel and other contingency placements.
East Midlands is highlighted so this place can be read inside the wider regional supported asylum map.
These cards translate the data into the most defensible local claims the site can make right now.
Leicester ranks 12 nationally and 2 in East Midlands for supported asylum count, placing it around the 97th percentile of local authorities by volume.
The supported asylum rate here is 38.93 per 10,000 residents, around the 93th percentile nationally. This matters because smaller places can carry a sharper load than bigger city totals imply.
328 people are in contingency accommodation here, around 21.7% of the supported asylum population and roughly the 92th percentile by contingency count.
No named current site or unnamed acknowledged count is attached to this area yet, which is itself a reminder that absence of public evidence is not evidence of absence.
The area profile should show route composition, not force users to infer it from a single asylum count.
The regional ranking matters because high-pressure areas compete for attention with their nearest peers, not just with the national top ten.
Leicester sits 12 nationally by supported asylum count and 2 within East Midlands. The raw volume is 1,512, but the rate of 38.93 per 10,000 residents gives a cleaner sense of local intensity than the headline count on its own.
Homes for Ukraine is the largest non-asylum pathway in this area at 268. That matters because the local story is not just about one route family; it is about how asylum support, humanitarian schemes, and historic resettlement stack together in one place.
East Midlands as a whole currently carries 7,829 people on supported asylum, with a weighted regional rate of 15.46 per 10,000 residents. This page puts Leicester inside that wider regional pressure field instead of treating it as an isolated case.
Place pages should merge live route data with the named and unnamed hotel evidence already on the public record.
That does not mean the area has no hotel use. It means the ledger has no publishable public evidence row attached yet.