Spending and contracts

Follow the migrants, follow the money, and keep the route labels honest.

The public money layer now has a real starter ledger behind it. It mixes prime contract scope, official funding instructions, and scrutiny cost rows so the public can see where money is documented, where it is estimated, and where the supplier chain still disappears into opacity.

Where the public values already exist

The starter ledger already contains large public figures. They need clear route labels and context, not flattening into one misleading spend total.

9 suppliers or public bodies tracked
Scrutiny estimate Asylum support

10-year asylum accommodation contract forecast

£15,300,000,000

10-year forecast as at 2024-11-08

Buyer Home Office
Supplier No supplier entity published
Scope route_specific

Source

Cost indicator Asylum support

Average daily asylum hotel cost

£5,770,000

2024/25 average

Buyer Home Office
Supplier No supplier entity published
Scope route_specific

Source

Funding instruction Homes for Ukraine

Homes for Ukraine standard local-authority tariff

£5,900

2025/26 standard arrivals tariff

Buyer Ministry of Housing Communities and Local Government
Supplier Participating local authorities
Scope route_specific

Source

Ledger composition at a glance

These visual splits show the structure of the money layer without collapsing unlike rows into one misleading total.

Route family record mix

Record counts by route or scheme family currently represented in the starter ledger.

11 public rows
Asylum support
7 4 rows with published value | 4 linked sites
Homes for Ukraine
2 2 rows with published value | 0 linked sites
UK Resettlement Scheme
1 0 rows with published value | 0 linked sites
Afghan Resettlement Programme
1 0 rows with published value | 0 linked sites
Record counts only. This avoids turning tariffs, contract scope, and scrutiny estimates into one fake spend figure.

Record type mix

The ledger keeps contract scope, funding instructions, and scrutiny rows split because they answer different questions.

11 public rows
Funding instruction
6 4 rows with published value
Prime contract scope
3 No rows with published value
Scrutiny estimate
1 1 rows with published value
Cost indicator
1 1 rows with published value
6 rows with published values

Buyer control

Buyer concentration belongs on the page because a small number of public bodies still control most of the route-specific money surface.

9 rows 3 route families

Home Office

4 rows with published values | 4 linked site s

Disclosed value total: £15,305,771,300

2 rows 1 route families

Ministry of Housing Communities and Local Government

2 rows with published values | 0 linked site s

Disclosed value total: £6,100

Named sites linked to money rows by region

East of England currently has the largest count of named sites already attached to money rows.

linked sites
East 2 Yorkshire 1 South East 1
Highlighted tiles mark the focus regions. Darker tiles indicate higher values in the latest local-authority snapshot.

What the ledger already proves

The money layer is still small, but it already exposes concentration, missing comparability, and where visible sites intersect with public contracts.

Asylum support still dominates the money ledger

Asylum support accounts for 7 of the 11 public rows now in scope, with 4 named sites already tied into the money layer.

Record type still matters more than one headline spend total

Funding instruction is the largest ledger class by row count. The page keeps row types separate because tariffs, contract scope, and scrutiny estimates are not comparable as one fake total.

Buyer control is concentrated

Home Office currently appears on 9 public rows across 3 route families, which is why buyer-level accountability belongs alongside supplier exposure.

Site-linked money rows are already geographically concentrated

East of England currently leads the starter money ledger on linked named sites, showing where contract responsibility and the visible estate already overlap in public evidence.

Supplier and public-body watchlist

The watchlist combines visible hotel exposure, public contract rows, and any disclosed contract value already in the starter ledger.

public_body low

Participating local authorities

6

Public money rows tied to this profile.

Linked sites 0
Published value Not disclosed / not normalized
Route families Homes for Ukraine, UK Resettlement Scheme, Asylum support, Afghan Resettlement Programme
prime_provider low

Serco

1

Public money row tied to this profile.

Linked sites 2
Published value Not disclosed / not normalized
Route families Asylum support
prime_provider low

Clearsprings Ready Homes

1

Public money row tied to this profile.

Linked sites 1
Published value Not disclosed / not normalized
Route families Asylum support
prime_provider low

Mears

1

Public money row tied to this profile.

Linked sites 1
Published value Not disclosed / not normalized
Route families Asylum support

Current public ledger

Current public money ledger rows with route labels, buyer and supplier context, disclosed values, and linked named sites.
Row Route or scheme Buyer / supplier Value Linked sites
Asylum accommodation and support contract regional scope: Serco
Prime contract scope route_specific
Asylum support
Current regional contract structure
Home Office
Serco
prime_provider
Not disclosed / not normalized
Bell Hotel
Epping Forest
partial
Phoenix Hotel
Epping Forest
unresolved
Asylum accommodation and support contract regional scope: Mears
Prime contract scope route_specific
Asylum support
Current regional contract structure
Home Office
Mears
prime_provider
Not disclosed / not normalized
Cedar Court Hotel
Wakefield
partial
Asylum accommodation and support contract regional scope: Clearsprings
Prime contract scope route_specific
Asylum support
Current regional contract structure
Home Office
Clearsprings Ready Homes
prime_provider
Not disclosed / not normalized
Stanwell Hotel
Spelthorne
partial
10-year asylum accommodation contract forecast
Scrutiny estimate route_specific
Asylum support
10-year forecast as at 2024-11-08
Home Office
No supplier entity published in row
£15,300,000,000
forecast_total
No site link in starter ledger
Average daily asylum hotel cost
Cost indicator route_specific
Asylum support
2024/25 average
Home Office
No supplier entity published in row
£5,770,000
daily_cost_average
No site link in starter ledger
Homes for Ukraine standard local-authority tariff
Funding instruction route_specific
Homes for Ukraine
Homes for Ukraine
2025/26 standard arrivals tariff
Ministry of Housing Communities and Local Government
Participating local authorities
public_body
£5,900
tariff
No site link in starter ledger
UK resettlement programmes funding instruction 2025 to 2026
Funding instruction route_specific
UK Resettlement Scheme
UK resettlement programmes
2025/26 funding instruction
Home Office
Participating local authorities
public_body
Not disclosed / not normalized
unknown
No site link in starter ledger
Asylum Grant 2025 to 2026 baseline payment
Funding instruction route_specific
Asylum support
Asylum Grant 2025 to 2026
2025/26 baseline payment
Home Office
Participating local authorities
public_body
£1,200
tariff
No site link in starter ledger
Asylum Grant 2025 to 2026 additional occupied bedspace payment
Funding instruction route_specific
Asylum support
Asylum Grant 2025 to 2026
Monthly marginal bedspace payment
Home Office
Participating local authorities
public_body
£100.00
tariff
No site link in starter ledger
Afghan schemes funding instruction 2024 to 2025
Funding instruction route_specific
Afghan Resettlement Programme
Afghan schemes
2024/25 funding instruction page updated 2025-09-01
Home Office
Participating local authorities
public_body
Not disclosed / not normalized
unknown
No site link in starter ledger
Homes for Ukraine welcome payment per guest
Funding instruction route_specific
Homes for Ukraine
Homes for Ukraine
Current guest welcome payment
Ministry of Housing Communities and Local Government
Participating local authorities
public_body
£200.00
grant
No site link in starter ledger

Supplier and public-body profiles

The wider ledger still matters, even after the watchlist highlights the most legible supplier exposure.

prime_provider low

Serco

2 linked sites | 1 public money row

Route families: Asylum support

Integrity signals: 0

hotel_operator elevated

Cedar Court Hotels

1 linked site | 0 public money rows

Route families: Asylum support

Integrity signals: 1

prime_provider low

Clearsprings

1 linked site | 0 public money rows

Route families: Asylum support

Integrity signals: 0

prime_provider low

Clearsprings Ready Homes

1 linked site | 1 public money row

Route families: Asylum support

Integrity signals: 0

prime_provider low

Mears

1 linked site | 1 public money row

Route families: Asylum support

Integrity signals: 0

brand_operator elevated

Millennium & Copthorne Hotels Limited

1 linked site | 0 public money rows

Route families: Asylum support

Integrity signals: 1

Company number: 01265742

freeholder medium

Somani Hotels Limited

1 linked site | 0 public money rows

Route families: Asylum support

Integrity signals: 0

Company number: 03929881

owner_group elevated

Splendid Hospitality Group LLP

1 linked site | 0 public money rows

Route families: Asylum support

Integrity signals: 1

Company number: OC331910

Investigative leads already visible in the data

These are the clearest current gaps between what the public can map and what the system still withholds.

warning

Prime regional contracts are mapped, but values are still not normalized in the starter public ledger

3 current prime-provider rows are linked to visible hotel geography without a disclosed contract value in this starter ledger.

Source

info

Official funding instructions exist, but several tariff tables still need normalization

2 funding-instruction rows are in scope but still need machine-readable component tables before place-level funding comparisons are safe to publish.

Source

warning

Current named hotels still outpace documented operator and owner chains

4 current named hotel sites are visible in the live ledger but still sit in partial or unresolved entity coverage.

Source

warning

Local response contracts remain the biggest money gap

The public ledger has prime-provider scope, national cost indicators, and official funding instructions, but almost no normalized local response contracts tied to named hotels or refugee placement work.

Source

Supplier layers to investigate next

The next public gains come from pushing below the prime contract layer and making subcontractor visibility publishable.

route_specific

Prime asylum accommodation providers

The national accommodation primes control regional delivery, subcontracting, and hotel procurement decisions.

SercoMearsClearsprings
Question to answer next

Which regions do they control?

local_route_relevant

Hotel operators and site managers

These are the entities physically operating or managing a named site used for asylum accommodation or related temporary placement.

Named hotel sitesManagement companiesFranchise operators
Question to answer next

Is the operator the same as the freeholder?

context_only

Freeholders, landlords, and charged owners

Ownership chains matter because the public-facing hotel brand is often not the economic beneficiary.

Freehold companiesProperty SPVsLenders with charges
Question to answer next

Who ultimately owns the site or SPV?

local_route_relevant

Subcontractors and service vendors

The supplier chain extends beyond accommodation primes and can expose hidden cost centres or repeat local contractors.

SecurityTransportCleaningFacilitiesWelfareInterpretation
Question to answer next

Which service categories recur across places?

context_only

Public body response spend

Councils and other public bodies may incur route-linked costs without publishing a neat asylum budget line.

Council emergency contractsNHS response workSchool transportSafeguarding response
Question to answer next

Which rows can be tied explicitly to asylum hotels or refugee-response work?

Integrity techniques

ownership

Beneficial ownership chain mapping

Link site operator, freeholder, PSCs, directors, and charges so the economic beneficiary is not hidden behind a hotel brand.

Integrity model adapted for asylum hotels

entity_risk

Company status, shell, and dormant signals

Flag dissolved, dormant, shell-like, or newly formed entities appearing in route-linked supplier chains.

Lancashire integrity outputs

procurement

Cross-body supplier matching

Track the same supplier, operator, or owner across Home Office, council, NHS, and wider public-body contexts.

Cross-council supplier model

site_intelligence

Property-to-spend linking

Join named sites and addresses to supplier rows, facilities work, land records, and local property intelligence.

Lancashire asset enrichment pattern

procurement

Threshold-splitting detection

Identify repeated sub-threshold awards or clustered spend that may avoid fuller procurement scrutiny.

Threshold manipulation checks

timing

Temporal clustering and sudden activation

Look for bursts of awards, site activation, or ownership changes around hotel opening or route-policy shocks.

Temporal clustering logic

network

Director overlap and network scoring

Use co-director, shared-address, and linked-company graphs to identify repeated groups around multiple sites or suppliers.

Network centrality and co-director analysis

governance

Revolving-door and interest checks

Compare public decision-makers, registers of interest, company roles, and supplier relationships where route-linked decisions are material.

Governance integrity layer

spend

Price, volume, and repeat-pattern anomalies

Find unusually high per-head, per-room, per-night, or repeat local response costs compared with peer areas and prior periods.

Accountability mart pattern analysis

transparency

Secrecy-gap tracking

Treat unnamed hotel use, withheld site lists, and opaque operator ownership as reportable system risks rather than background noise.

asylumstats hotel-evidence model

Scope and publish rules

Route or scheme specific

Official datasets that directly identify an asylum route, refugee resettlement scheme, refugee family route, or humanitarian route.

Local route-relevant

Council statements, FOIs, planning records, or local documents that explicitly refer to asylum hotels, refugee resettlement, Afghan arrivals, Ukraine arrivals, or related local response.

Context only

General council finance, procurement, or supplier data kept as research context and never merged into public asylum or refugee charts unless a row is explicitly tied to a route or scheme.

Publish rule

Do not publish an owner or operator claim unless the site-to-entity match has strong documentary backing.

Publish rule

Do not treat generic council spend or procurement as asylum or refugee spend unless the row text, supplier, site, or source explicitly ties it to a route or scheme.

Publish rule

Publish risk signals with provenance and caveats, not as unsupported accusations.

Publish rule

Keep route-specific facts, local evidence, and context infrastructure visibly distinct on public pages.

Inclusion test and current limits

Inclusion test

Include publicly if the source explicitly identifies an asylum route, refugee scheme, family route, or humanitarian route.

Inclusion test

Keep small boat arrivals separate from refugee resettlement schemes and from Ukraine humanitarian routes.

Inclusion test

Treat local hotel statements, resettlement housing statements, FOIs, and planning records as local route-relevant evidence, not as national totals.

Inclusion test

Keep general council finance and procurement as background context unless a row can be attributed to a specific route or scheme.

Current limit

The starter money ledger deliberately mixes prime contract scope, funding instructions, and scrutiny cost rows so the public can see the whole accountability chain before local procurement ingestion is complete.

Current limit

Tariff or grant rows are not aggregate spend totals. They are rate components or official funding instructions that still need claimant or placement counts before place-level spending can be estimated safely.

Current limit

Prime-provider rows show current regional responsibility, not a site-specific newly awarded notice for each named hotel.

Current limit

Local response contracts, subcontractor rows, and council emergency procurement remain the biggest missing public layer.