10-year asylum accommodation contract forecast
£15,300,000,000
10-year forecast as at 2024-11-08
The public money layer now has a real starter ledger behind it. It mixes prime contract scope, official funding instructions, and scrutiny cost rows so the public can see where money is documented, where it is estimated, and where the supplier chain still disappears into opacity.
The starter ledger already contains large public figures. They need clear route labels and context, not flattening into one misleading spend total.
£15,300,000,000
10-year forecast as at 2024-11-08
£5,770,000
2024/25 average
£5,900
2025/26 standard arrivals tariff
These visual splits show the structure of the money layer without collapsing unlike rows into one misleading total.
Record counts by route or scheme family currently represented in the starter ledger.
The ledger keeps contract scope, funding instructions, and scrutiny rows split because they answer different questions.
Buyer concentration belongs on the page because a small number of public bodies still control most of the route-specific money surface.
4 rows with published values | 4 linked site s
Disclosed value total: £15,305,771,300
2 rows with published values | 0 linked site s
Disclosed value total: £6,100
East of England currently has the largest count of named sites already attached to money rows.
The money layer is still small, but it already exposes concentration, missing comparability, and where visible sites intersect with public contracts.
Asylum support accounts for 7 of the 11 public rows now in scope, with 4 named sites already tied into the money layer.
Funding instruction is the largest ledger class by row count. The page keeps row types separate because tariffs, contract scope, and scrutiny estimates are not comparable as one fake total.
Home Office currently appears on 9 public rows across 3 route families, which is why buyer-level accountability belongs alongside supplier exposure.
East of England currently leads the starter money ledger on linked named sites, showing where contract responsibility and the visible estate already overlap in public evidence.
The watchlist combines visible hotel exposure, public contract rows, and any disclosed contract value already in the starter ledger.
6
Public money rows tied to this profile.
1
Public money row tied to this profile.
1
Public money row tied to this profile.
1
Public money row tied to this profile.
| Row | Route or scheme | Buyer / supplier | Value | Linked sites |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Asylum accommodation and support contract regional scope: Serco Prime contract scope route_specific | Asylum support Current regional contract structure | Home Office Serco prime_provider | Not disclosed / not normalized | Bell Hotel Epping Forest partial Phoenix Hotel Epping Forest unresolved |
| Asylum accommodation and support contract regional scope: Mears Prime contract scope route_specific | Asylum support Current regional contract structure | Home Office Mears prime_provider | Not disclosed / not normalized | Cedar Court Hotel Wakefield partial |
| Asylum accommodation and support contract regional scope: Clearsprings Prime contract scope route_specific | Asylum support Current regional contract structure | Home Office Clearsprings Ready Homes prime_provider | Not disclosed / not normalized | Stanwell Hotel Spelthorne partial |
| 10-year asylum accommodation contract forecast Scrutiny estimate route_specific | Asylum support 10-year forecast as at 2024-11-08 | Home Office No supplier entity published in row | £15,300,000,000 forecast_total | No site link in starter ledger |
| Average daily asylum hotel cost Cost indicator route_specific | Asylum support 2024/25 average | Home Office No supplier entity published in row | £5,770,000 daily_cost_average | No site link in starter ledger |
| Homes for Ukraine standard local-authority tariff Funding instruction route_specific | Homes for Ukraine Homes for Ukraine 2025/26 standard arrivals tariff | Ministry of Housing Communities and Local Government Participating local authorities public_body | £5,900 tariff | No site link in starter ledger |
| UK resettlement programmes funding instruction 2025 to 2026 Funding instruction route_specific | UK Resettlement Scheme UK resettlement programmes 2025/26 funding instruction | Home Office Participating local authorities public_body | Not disclosed / not normalized unknown | No site link in starter ledger |
| Asylum Grant 2025 to 2026 baseline payment Funding instruction route_specific | Asylum support Asylum Grant 2025 to 2026 2025/26 baseline payment | Home Office Participating local authorities public_body | £1,200 tariff | No site link in starter ledger |
| Asylum Grant 2025 to 2026 additional occupied bedspace payment Funding instruction route_specific | Asylum support Asylum Grant 2025 to 2026 Monthly marginal bedspace payment | Home Office Participating local authorities public_body | £100.00 tariff | No site link in starter ledger |
| Afghan schemes funding instruction 2024 to 2025 Funding instruction route_specific | Afghan Resettlement Programme Afghan schemes 2024/25 funding instruction page updated 2025-09-01 | Home Office Participating local authorities public_body | Not disclosed / not normalized unknown | No site link in starter ledger |
| Homes for Ukraine welcome payment per guest Funding instruction route_specific | Homes for Ukraine Homes for Ukraine Current guest welcome payment | Ministry of Housing Communities and Local Government Participating local authorities public_body | £200.00 grant | No site link in starter ledger |
The wider ledger still matters, even after the watchlist highlights the most legible supplier exposure.
2 linked sites | 1 public money row
Route families: Asylum support
Integrity signals: 0
1 linked site | 0 public money rows
Route families: Asylum support
Integrity signals: 1
1 linked site | 0 public money rows
Route families: Asylum support
Integrity signals: 0
1 linked site | 1 public money row
Route families: Asylum support
Integrity signals: 0
1 linked site | 1 public money row
Route families: Asylum support
Integrity signals: 0
1 linked site | 0 public money rows
Route families: Asylum support
Integrity signals: 1
Company number: 01265742
1 linked site | 0 public money rows
Route families: Asylum support
Integrity signals: 0
Company number: 03929881
1 linked site | 0 public money rows
Route families: Asylum support
Integrity signals: 1
Company number: OC331910
These are the clearest current gaps between what the public can map and what the system still withholds.
3 current prime-provider rows are linked to visible hotel geography without a disclosed contract value in this starter ledger.
2 funding-instruction rows are in scope but still need machine-readable component tables before place-level funding comparisons are safe to publish.
4 current named hotel sites are visible in the live ledger but still sit in partial or unresolved entity coverage.
The public ledger has prime-provider scope, national cost indicators, and official funding instructions, but almost no normalized local response contracts tied to named hotels or refugee placement work.
The next public gains come from pushing below the prime contract layer and making subcontractor visibility publishable.
The national accommodation primes control regional delivery, subcontracting, and hotel procurement decisions.
These are the entities physically operating or managing a named site used for asylum accommodation or related temporary placement.
Ownership chains matter because the public-facing hotel brand is often not the economic beneficiary.
The supplier chain extends beyond accommodation primes and can expose hidden cost centres or repeat local contractors.
Councils and other public bodies may incur route-linked costs without publishing a neat asylum budget line.
Link site operator, freeholder, PSCs, directors, and charges so the economic beneficiary is not hidden behind a hotel brand.
Integrity model adapted for asylum hotels
Flag dissolved, dormant, shell-like, or newly formed entities appearing in route-linked supplier chains.
Lancashire integrity outputs
Track the same supplier, operator, or owner across Home Office, council, NHS, and wider public-body contexts.
Cross-council supplier model
Join named sites and addresses to supplier rows, facilities work, land records, and local property intelligence.
Lancashire asset enrichment pattern
Identify repeated sub-threshold awards or clustered spend that may avoid fuller procurement scrutiny.
Threshold manipulation checks
Look for bursts of awards, site activation, or ownership changes around hotel opening or route-policy shocks.
Temporal clustering logic
Use co-director, shared-address, and linked-company graphs to identify repeated groups around multiple sites or suppliers.
Network centrality and co-director analysis
Compare public decision-makers, registers of interest, company roles, and supplier relationships where route-linked decisions are material.
Governance integrity layer
Find unusually high per-head, per-room, per-night, or repeat local response costs compared with peer areas and prior periods.
Accountability mart pattern analysis
Treat unnamed hotel use, withheld site lists, and opaque operator ownership as reportable system risks rather than background noise.
asylumstats hotel-evidence model
Official datasets that directly identify an asylum route, refugee resettlement scheme, refugee family route, or humanitarian route.
Council statements, FOIs, planning records, or local documents that explicitly refer to asylum hotels, refugee resettlement, Afghan arrivals, Ukraine arrivals, or related local response.
General council finance, procurement, or supplier data kept as research context and never merged into public asylum or refugee charts unless a row is explicitly tied to a route or scheme.
Do not publish an owner or operator claim unless the site-to-entity match has strong documentary backing.
Do not treat generic council spend or procurement as asylum or refugee spend unless the row text, supplier, site, or source explicitly ties it to a route or scheme.
Publish risk signals with provenance and caveats, not as unsupported accusations.
Keep route-specific facts, local evidence, and context infrastructure visibly distinct on public pages.
Include publicly if the source explicitly identifies an asylum route, refugee scheme, family route, or humanitarian route.
Keep small boat arrivals separate from refugee resettlement schemes and from Ukraine humanitarian routes.
Treat local hotel statements, resettlement housing statements, FOIs, and planning records as local route-relevant evidence, not as national totals.
Keep general council finance and procurement as background context unless a row can be attributed to a specific route or scheme.
The starter money ledger deliberately mixes prime contract scope, funding instructions, and scrutiny cost rows so the public can see the whole accountability chain before local procurement ingestion is complete.
Tariff or grant rows are not aggregate spend totals. They are rate components or official funding instructions that still need claimant or placement counts before place-level spending can be estimated safely.
Prime-provider rows show current regional responsibility, not a site-specific newly awarded notice for each named hotel.
Local response contracts, subcontractor rows, and council emergency procurement remain the biggest missing public layer.