Quarter-end stock, not throughput
Supported asylum counts show how many people were receiving support at the end of the period. They are not new claims, arrivals, or the number of distinct people seen across the period.
Official local-authority snapshot as at 2025-12-31. This page keeps live route data and local hotel evidence on one place-level surface so pressure can be read in context. Supported asylum here means people on support at that quarter end, not the number of different people whose claims were processed locally, and not a one-word substitute for the backlog.
A flat or slowly moving local line does not prove the same people stayed on support, and it does not prove claims were not being processed. It only shows the quarter-end stock that remained on support, which overlaps with but is not identical to the awaiting-decision backlog.
Supported asylum counts show how many people were receiving support at the end of the period. They are not new claims, arrivals, or the number of distinct people seen across the period.
People awaiting an initial decision and people on asylum support overlap, but they are not identical groups. Some supported people are further into appeals or on other support routes, while some people awaiting an initial decision are not in the published support count.
The stock changes when people enter support and when they leave it through case progression, including grants, refusals, withdrawals, departures, or moves out of the published support categories.
A place hovering around the same level can mean low movement, or heavy turnover with inflows offset by exits. The published local tables do not show how many different people passed through support in that area.
Quarter-end stock series to Dec 2025. A rise or fall is a net change in the number of people on support at period end, not the number of new claims or distinct people moving through the caseload. Support stock also overlaps with, but is not identical to, the awaiting-decision backlog.
-20.7% net change in quarter-end stock by the latest step.
+3477.8% change in quarter-end stock from the first visible point to Dec 2025.
The visible trend line is built entirely from official quarter-end supported asylum values in the local area series.
Switch metric and comparison frame to read Stevenage as a pressure leader, rate outlier, contingency site, or three-pathway case without leaving the page.
Stevenage ranks 9 of 45 in East of England; Luton currently leads this regional measure.
Stevenage ranks 109 of 361 nationally on supported asylum.
Stevenage ranks 3 of 45 in East of England; Braintree currently leads this regional measure.
Stevenage ranks 32 of 361 nationally on supported asylum rate.
Stevenage ranks 5 of 45 in East of England; Dacorum currently leads this regional measure.
Stevenage ranks 38 of 361 nationally on contingency accommodation.
Stevenage ranks 27 of 45 in East of England; Peterborough currently leads this regional measure.
Stevenage ranks 214 of 361 nationally on three-pathway total.
The local picture only becomes legible when supported asylum, contingency use, Ukraine arrivals, and Afghan programme population are kept distinct.
322 people are on asylum support here at quarter end, with a rate of 35.09 per 10,000 residents. 274 are in contingency accommodation.
This combines supported asylum, Homes for Ukraine arrivals, and Afghan programme population, representing 0.5% of the local population.
No named current hotel site is attached to this area in the starter ledger yet.
These strips show where Stevenage sits in the national distribution for the most important place-level pressure measures.
National distribution across all local-authority rows.
Rate per 10,000 residents.
Hotel and other contingency placements.
East of England is highlighted so this place can be read inside the wider regional supported asylum map.
These cards translate the data into the most defensible local claims the site can make right now.
Stevenage ranks 109 nationally and 9 in East of England for supported asylum count, placing it around the 70th percentile of local authorities by volume.
The supported asylum rate here is 35.09 per 10,000 residents, around the 91th percentile nationally. This matters because smaller places can carry a sharper load than bigger city totals imply.
274 people are in contingency accommodation here, around 85.1% of the supported asylum population and roughly the 90th percentile by contingency count.
No named current site or unnamed acknowledged count is attached to this area yet, which is itself a reminder that absence of public evidence is not evidence of absence.
The area profile should show route composition, not force users to infer it from a single asylum count.
The regional ranking matters because high-pressure areas compete for attention with their nearest peers, not just with the national top ten.
Stevenage sits 109 nationally by supported asylum count and 9 within East of England. The raw volume is 322, but the rate of 35.09 per 10,000 residents gives a cleaner sense of local intensity than the headline count on its own.
Homes for Ukraine is the largest non-asylum pathway in this area at 90. That matters because the local story is not just about one route family; it is about how asylum support, humanitarian schemes, and historic resettlement stack together in one place.
East of England as a whole currently carries 6,715 people on supported asylum, with a weighted regional rate of 10.21 per 10,000 residents. This page puts Stevenage inside that wider regional pressure field instead of treating it as an isolated case.
Place pages should merge live route data with the named and unnamed hotel evidence already on the public record.
That does not mean the area has no hotel use. It means the ledger has no publishable public evidence row attached yet.