The visible estate is already named
Mears already touches 2 current named sites across 2 places.
Mears
Prime provider with 2 current named sites, 1 public money row, and 2 current chain gaps. This page keeps named site evidence, linked money rows, and place pressure on one actor-level surface so the public can move from hotel to provider or owner without losing the chain.
Prime provider 2 current sites 1 money row low
What matters first
Mears is already visible on named hotel sites, which means the public chain can now run from actor to hotel to place and, in some cases, to public money.
Public money rows already attach to this actor
Asylum accommodation and support contract regional scope: Mears is part of the public money layer already tied to this profile.
Current chain gaps are still part of the story
2 of 2 current sites linked to this profile still sit in partial or unresolved chain coverage.
Timeline of public evidence
These are the dated moments when this entity appears in the public record through named site evidence or published money rows.
Earliest dated event currently attached to this profile.
Most recent dated event in the current evidence chain.
Earliest dated public record for a current named site on this profile.
Most recent dated money row attached to this profile.
17 Sept 2025
Allerton Court Hotel enters the public record
North Yorkshire appears in the visible site chain for Mears.
20 Aug 2025
Cedar Court Hotel enters the public record
Wakefield appears in the visible site chain for Mears.
Exposure summary
This is the quickest read on how much of the visible current estate is still non-resolved, where the linked pressure is landing, and how much public money is actually disclosed.
Non-resolved chain exposure still dominates the visible estate
Mears still has 2 of 2 current named sites in partial or unresolved coverage, which is 100% of its visible current estate.
Wakefield is the main linked pressure point
648 people were on supported asylum there at quarter end, with 140 in contingency accommodation across 1 current linked site.
Public money visibility is still partial
1 linked money row already sit on this profile, but none of them disclose a normalized public value yet.
50% of current named sites.
50% of current named sites.
0% of current named sites.
Regional contract coverage
This is the wider contract field attached to the published asylum accommodation geography. It is broader than the named estate and should not be read as proof of a named local hotel in every covered area.
Contract geography is wider than the visible estate
Mears currently covers 70 local authority rows in the published regional contract structure, but only 2 of those are already tied to named hotel evidence on this profile.
Visibility gaps still matter inside the contract field
2 covered areas already carry named current hotel evidence, while 1 covered areas sit in unnamed-only hotel visibility gaps.
Highest-pressure covered area
Glasgow City is currently the largest supported-asylum place in this contract field at 3,870.
#01 Scotland
Glasgow City
3,870
Quarter-end supported asylum stock, with 0 in contingency accommodation. No named current hotel row is public here in the live starter ledger yet.
#02 Northern Ireland
Belfast
1,607
Quarter-end supported asylum stock, with 0 in contingency accommodation. No named current hotel row is public here in the live starter ledger yet.
#03 Yorkshire and The Humber
Leeds
1,416
Quarter-end supported asylum stock, with 276 in contingency accommodation. No named current hotel row is public here in the live starter ledger yet.
#04 Yorkshire and The Humber
Bradford
1,266
Quarter-end supported asylum stock, with 233 in contingency accommodation. No named current hotel row is public here in the live starter ledger yet.
#05 Yorkshire and The Humber
Sheffield
1,126
Quarter-end supported asylum stock, with 229 in contingency accommodation. No named current hotel row is public here in the live starter ledger yet.
Region spread
Region counts stay tied to named-site and linked-place evidence so footprint claims do not outrun the public ledger.
Yorkshire and The Humber England
2 current sites
2 linked places and 2 non-resolved current chain s in this region slice.
Supported asylum across linked places 1,000
Contingency across linked places 255
Historical named sites 0
Places: North Yorkshire, Wakefield
Linked-place rankings
These are the heaviest linked place rows for this entity, ordered by quarter-end supported asylum stock and then contingency pressure.
#01 Yorkshire and The Humber
Wakefield
648
Quarter-end supported asylum stock, with 140 in contingency accommodation and 1 current site.
Supported asylum rate 17.62 per 10,000
Historical linked sites 0
#02 Yorkshire and The Humber
North Yorkshire
352
Quarter-end supported asylum stock, with 115 in contingency accommodation and 1 current site.
Supported asylum rate 5.54 per 10,000
Historical linked sites 0
Current site footprint
Each site card keeps the relationship label, the local place, and the current chain status on the same row.
Prime provider partial
Cedar Court Hotel
Wakefield, Yorkshire and The Humber. 1 linked money row and 1 integrity signal.
Confidence high
People reported n/a
Prime provider unresolved
Allerton Court Hotel
North Yorkshire, Yorkshire and The Humber. 0 linked money rows and 0 integrity signals.
Confidence medium
People reported n/a
Public money surface
These are the public rows already attached to this profile. They stay split by route family and row type.
Asylum support prime contract scope
Asylum accommodation and support contract regional scope: Mears
Current regional responsibility in the public contract structure. The starter ledger uses this to map visible current hotel sites to a prime provider.
Buyer Home Office
Published value Not disclosed / not normalized
Linked sites 1
Linked places
These places are where the current public site chain already meets quarter-end local pressure data.
Yorkshire and The Humber 1 current site
Wakefield
648 people on supported asylum and 140 in contingency accommodation in the latest local snapshot.
Sites: Cedar Court Hotel
Yorkshire and The Humber 1 current site
North Yorkshire
352 people on supported asylum and 115 in contingency accommodation in the latest local snapshot.
Sites: Allerton Court Hotel
Concrete case files
These are the clearest current examples of this entity showing up on a named hotel site with a followable place and money chain.
Visible chain Wakefieldpartialdirect money link
Cedar Court Hotel now links the hotel and money layers
Cedar Court Hotel in Wakefield already has a direct public money row attached. 648 people were on asylum support there at quarter end, with 140 in contingency accommodation.
- 01 Money trail
Asylum accommodation and support contract regional scope: Mears is already the public money row tied to this site.
Open direct money row - 02 Place pressure
648 people were on asylum support there at quarter end, with 140 in contingency accommodation.
Open place profile
Broken chain North Yorkshireunresolvedprovider money link
Allerton Court Hotel is public, but the chain still breaks
Allerton Court Hotel in North Yorkshire already has a public hotel row and a provider-level money trail. 352 people were on asylum support there at quarter end, with 115 in contingency accommodation.
- 01 Money trail
Mears is the public contract layer attached to this site in the live starter ledger.
Open provider money trail - 02 Place pressure
352 people were on asylum support there at quarter end, with 115 in contingency accommodation.
Open place profile
The money step is provider-scope rather than site-specific.
Source trail
The source layer below is the public trail currently holding this profile together.
Money row
Asylum accommodation and support contracts
Prime-provider source
Mears prime-provider source
Supplier source
Mears supplier source
Editorial note
Current regional responsibility in the public contract structure. The starter ledger uses this to map visible current hotel sites to a prime provider.
Editorial note
Regional asylum accommodation provider under the current Home Office contract structure.